Mostafa Morady Moghaddam; Farhad Moezzipour
Volume 9, Issue 20 , November 2017, , Pages 187-221
Abstract
This article brings to light various organisational and implementational clashes with regards to the conceptualisation of language planning at the national level, and the misplanning of local practices with regards to degree programmes, language journals and conferences in Iranian higher education. This ...
Read More
This article brings to light various organisational and implementational clashes with regards to the conceptualisation of language planning at the national level, and the misplanning of local practices with regards to degree programmes, language journals and conferences in Iranian higher education. This paper also argues that at its current status, language education in relation to English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Applied Linguistics in Iran, both at national and local levels, suffer from ‘regulatory barriers’. The paper asks for an in-depth language policy and planning (LPP) that would clarify the blurred boundaries between ELT, applied linguistics, and linguistics in Iranian higher education. This paper strongly recommends an urge for reconsideration of language-in-education planning in Iran; a change that would be able to address both theoretical and applied language problems at national and local levels. The attempt should begin with organising a clear and comprehensive language planning strategy with regard to language programmes. This would mean carefully determining the scope and boundaries of the fields ELT, applied linguistics, and linguistics in the higher educational context. The proceeding challenge is fixing the problematic planning of language programmes at the local level, considering journals, conferences, and syllabuses. The findings presented in this work are useful for language policymakers to regulate language-in-education policy and planning.
Rahman Sahragard; Alireza Rasti
Volume 9, Issue 19 , June 2017, , Pages 145-168
Abstract
This investigation set out to look into the issue of teachers’ exercise of agency in the Iranian EFL context. More specifically, as part of a larger study, it reports on the ways two Iranian Ministry of Education teachers make sense of and operate in the country’s educational setting under ...
Read More
This investigation set out to look into the issue of teachers’ exercise of agency in the Iranian EFL context. More specifically, as part of a larger study, it reports on the ways two Iranian Ministry of Education teachers make sense of and operate in the country’s educational setting under the demands of a centralist system of education. Priestley, Biesta, & Robinson’s (2013) framework of teacher agency formed the conceptual backbone of the present study as well as guiding the data collection/analysis of the study. Qualitative data, from semi-structured interviews as well as follow-up data collection procedures, were gleaned from the participants over the course of an academic year and were subjected to analytical interpretation in the light of the said framework. The researchers came up with findings which, in the main, gave more weight to the well-roundedness of Priestly, Biesta, & Robinson’s model of teacher agency. The results also pointed to the highly situated nature of teacher responsiveness and action, thereby undermining the still prevalent views of the essentialist and idealized character of (teacher) agency. The results of the study are liable to be of use, among others, to case-based teacher education programs.Keywords: teacher agency, English as a Foreign Language, Iran, teacher education
