Evaluating the Influence of Formative and Suative Assessments on EFL Learners’ Listening and Reading Comprehension

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of English Language and Literature, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of summative, formative, and combined assessments on the development of listening and reading comprehension skills on advanced Iranian EFL learners. Data were collected from 40 advanced EFL learners, aged 19 to 35, from intact classes at a higher education institute, divided into three experimental groups, each receiving one of the assessment types (summative, formative, or a combination of both), along with a control group. Learners’ progress in listening and reading comprehension was measured over a four-month period using pre- and post-tests administered at the end of the term. Data analysis involved ANOVA, ANCOVA, and post hoc LSD tests. The findings of this longitudinal study revealed that while the combined application of formative and summative assessments had a significant positive impact on listening comprehension, neither assessment type alone contributed to improvement in this area. In contrast, the results showed that all forms of assessment—whether summative, formative, or combined—led to notable improvements in reading comprehension. These results highlight the differential effects of assessment types on listening and reading skills, suggesting implications for assessment practices in EFL contexts.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Research-based principles of assessment for learning to guide classroom practice. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Abdolmajid, M., Mowlaie, B., & Rahimi, A. (2021). Comparative effects of partial dictation and dictogloss on listening comprehension ability of EFL learners. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 11(3), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v11i3.4783
Ahmadi, M., Ismail, H., & Kabilan, M. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p235
Al-Qahtani, A. (2015). The effect of explicit instruction of textual discourse markers on Saudi EFL learners’ reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n4p57
Alshahrani, T. (2023). Does the use of web-based extensive listening activities affect foreign language listening anxiety and foreign language anxiety? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(6), 1710-1721. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.30
Ashraf, H., Fatemi, M., & Naderi, S. (2013). The effect of active learning instruction on the intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(5), 225. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i5.4264
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
Bayat, A. (2017). The beneficial impact/s of applying formative assessment on Iranian university students' anxiety reduction and listening efficacy. International Journal of Languages Education, 5(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1740
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment–an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers’ summative assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003696016
Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.557020
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Buck, G. (2001). An overview of listening comprehension. Assessing listening, 1-30.
Campione, J. C. (1989). Assisted assessment: a taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities 22,151–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200303
Chen, H. (2020). A contrastive analysis of classroom-based language assessments. English Language Teaching, 13(5), 110-114. https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/42586/44447
Chen, I. J. (2016). Hypertext glosses for foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition: Effects of assessment methods. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.983935
Covic, T., & Jones, M. K. (2008). Is the essay resubmission option a formative or a summative assessment and does it matter as long as the grades improve? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930601122928
Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
Gan, Z., & Leung, C. (2020). Illustrating formative assessment in task-based language teaching. ELT Journal, 74(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz048
Gattullo, F. (2000). Formative assessment in ELT primary (elementary) classrooms: An Italian case study. Language Testing, 17(2), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220001700210
Ghahremani, D. (2013). The Effects of Implementing Summative Assessment, Formative Assessment and Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Listening Ability and Listening Strategy Use. Journal of Language and Translation 3, 2(5), 59-68. https://journals.iau.ir/article_514741_e0c81dbfe5e918d5aceb6931727e44fe.pdf
Ghiatău, R., Diac, G., & Curelaru, V. (2011). Interaction between summative and formative in higher education assessment: students’ perception. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 220-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.065
Harris, L. (2007). Employing formative assessment in the classroom. Improving Schools, 10(3), 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207082558
Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
Hosseini, H., & Ghabanchi, Z. (2014). The effect of portfolio assessment on EFL learners’ reading comprehension and motivation. English Language Teaching, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n5p110
Huseynova, F. (2023). Assessment of students’ reading comprehension skills in teaching English. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110600
Ismail, S., Rahul, D., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC Journal, 45(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546962
Kabri, K. (2023). The role of synchronous and asynchronous multimedia in EFL listening comprehension. NextGen, 1(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.58660/nextgen.v1i2.39
Lau, A. M. S. (2016). ‘Formative good, summative bad?’–A review of the dichotomy in assessment literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(4), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600
Mahshanian, A., Shoghi, R., & Bahrami, M. (2019). Investigating the differential effects of formative and summative assessment on EFL learners’ end-of-term achievement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 1055. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.19
Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., & Rämö, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of self-assessment: a comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296-1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1688282
Ortega, D., & Minchala, O. (2017). Assessing students in an authentic and ongoing manner in the English classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 159. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.01
Pacheco, A. G. Q. (2022). Assessment of young English-language learners: Formative and summative strategies. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 36, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.15517/RLM.V0I36.48313
Pangestu, A., Hidayah, J., & Apriani, E. (2021). The impacts of explicit and implicit instructions of English connectors on EFL students’ reading comprehension. Linguists Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.29300/ling.v7i1.4305
Perera, L., Nguyen, H. O. A., & Watty, K. I. M. (2014). Formative feedback through summative tutorial-based assessments: The relationship to student performance. Accounting Education, 23(5), 424-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2014.947093
Richards, J. C., & Sandy, C. (2014). Placement and evaluation package. Cambridge University Press.
Safa, M., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 28(3), 987-1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211021821
Sönmez, M., & Cetinkaya, F. C. (2022). The Effect of formative assessment on reading comprehension. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9, 88-108. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1104868
Taras, M. (2005). Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408091655
Teo, L., Gani, N., & Ummah, M. (2022). Listening difficulties and strategies in preparing for IELTS listening test using online learning: a case study of intensive English learners. Teknosastik, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v20i1.1367
Torres, J. O. (2019). Positive impact of utilizing more formative assessment over summative assessment in the EFL/ESL Classroom. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2019.91001
Trotter, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679506
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wijaya, K. (2022). The utilities of online formative assessment in Indonesian EFL learning contexts during covid-19 era. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 178-198. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v7i2.14249
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Yazidi, R. (2023). Investigating the influence of formative assessment on the learning process in the English language classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v9i1.4540
Yildirim, A., Oscarson, A. D., Hilden, R., & Fröjdendahl, B. (2024). Teaching summative assessment: A curriculum analysis of pre-service language teacher education in Sweden and Finland. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231214799
Zandi, S. (2022). A qualitative study on EFL teachers’ awareness towards the implementation of dynamic assessment. JLS, 5(3), 398-413. https://doi.org/10.25130/jls.5.3.24

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics