The Impact of Grammarly Software on Enhancing Writing Skills among EFL Learners

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, English Department, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, English Department Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

3 M.A. in TEFL, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In light of ongoing challenges in writing education and the needs of digital-native learners, this study explored the effectiveness of using the free version of Grammarly in the writing development of EFL learners. Thirty-three TEFL students at Shahid Rajaee University were randomly selected and participated in the study. Using a quantitative one-group design, their writing performance was assessed through six tasks and analyzed via one-way Repeated Measures MANOVA. The results indicated a consistent improvement in overall writing performance through the regular use of Grammarly as an automatic corrective feedback tool. To identify which writing components improved, an RM-MANOVA was conducted on grammar, spelling, punctuation, and clarity. The analysis showed significant improvement only in grammatical accuracy, with other aspects remaining unchanged. These findings highlight Grammarly’s potential in enhancing grammatical skills. The study contributes to ELT by encouraging the integration of ICT-related content into the EFL curriculum and teacher training programs, emphasizing the role of AI tools in language learning. These findings highlight the increasing impact of AI-powered tools in improving writing skills for language learners. Educators should balance automated feedback with personalized instruction. As research on effectiveness of Grammarly is still limited, further studies are necessary to fully understand its educational potential.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Aghisna Daroina, Widy Esa Febriani, Amalia Aulianisa, & Wihdah Amali Fadlia. (2022). Systematic literature review: Grammarly as a medium in analyzing grammar for university students. Conference on English Language Teaching, 2, 276-289. https://doi.org/10.24090/celti.v2.56
Anh, D. T. N. (2019). EFL student’s writing skills: Challenges and remedies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(6), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0906017484
Anson, C. M. (n.d.). CANʹT TOUCH THIS: Machine Scoring of Student Essays, 38-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt4cgq0p.6
Arisandi, V., & Sudarajat, A. (2023). Revisiting “Grammarly” in Higher Education (Literature Review). Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(8), 3351–3356. https://doi.org/10.31862/9785426311961
Ashrafganjoe, M., Rezai, M.  J., & Elhambakhsh, S.  E. (2022). Providing computer-based feedback through Grammarly in writing classes. 12(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.30495/ttlt.2022.690747
Aydin, Z., & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–180. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2014/aydinyildiz.pdf
Benalileche, A. (2021). Applying Grammarly Software to Correct Mistakes Committed by Master Two Students in Writing Dissertations. Centre-univ-mila.dz, 1(1), 184/195. https://doi.org/2773-2797
Birhane, A. (2021). Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2), 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. ‏Feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27(1), 1-18.
Cancino, M., & Panes, J. (2021). The impact of Google Translate on L2 writing quality measures: Evidence from Chilean EFL high school learners. System, 98, 102464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system. 2021.102464
Crosthwaite, P., Storch, N., & Schweinberger, M. (2020). Less is more. The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100729
Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students’ perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315
Dikli, S. (2010). The nature of automated essay scoring feedback. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 99-134. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.99-134
Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining the Impact of Grammarly on the Quality of Mobile L2 Writing. JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.336
Du, J. (2020). Non-native English-speaking engineers’ writing at the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1983-3
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of the web quest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
Eckstein, G., Sims, M., & Rohm, L. (2020). Dynamic written corrective feedback among graduate students: The effects of feedback timing. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1339
Faisal, F., & Carabella, P. A. (2023). Utilizing Grammarly in an academic writing process: Higher-education students perceived views. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006
Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519
Gain, A., Rao, M., & Bhat, S. K. (2019). Usage of Grammarly–online grammar and spelling checker tool at the Health Sciences Library, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal: A study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–13. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac
Ghufron, M. (2019). Exploring automated feedback program ‘Grammarly’ and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing assessment: Modern vs. traditional assessment. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285308
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Grammarly (2020) Grammarly: free online writing assistant. https://www.grammarly.com/. Accessed 15 August 2020.
Guo, Q., & Barrot, J. S. (2019). Effects of metalinguistic explanation and direct correction on EFL learners’ linguistic accuracy. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1540320
Hampp, P. L., Kumayas, T. A., & Lengkoan, F. (2021). Synthesizing grammar and structure problems faced by Indonesian TOEFL participants. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha, 9(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i1.33811
Hartshorne, D. (2021). Grammarly review: How to become a better writer. https://bloggingwizard.com/Grammarly-review/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004 https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0805.08
Huang, H.-W., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using Grammarly to Improve Students’ Writing Skills. 122–127.
Hutchison, A. B. (2019). Assessing the feasibility of online writing support for technical writing students (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).‏
Hsu, H.-C. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1542407
Jabali, O. (2018). Students' attitudes towards EFL university writing: A case study at an-najah national University, Palestine. Heliyon, 4(11), e00896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00896
Javier, D. R. (2022). App Review Using Tech Tools for Academic Writing:" Grammarly" as a Pedagogical Tool. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(2), n2.‏
Karyuatry, L. (2018). Grammarly as a tool to improve students’ writing quality: Free online-proofreader across the boundaries. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora), 2(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v2i1.2297
Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437– 451. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852
Lasi, F. (2019). Error Analysis in Academic Writing: A Case of EFL Students in North Central Timor. UICELL, 3, 21–22.
Lee, L. (2020). An Exploratory Study of Using Personal Blogs for L2 Writing in Fully Online Language Courses. In B. Zou & M. Thomas (Eds.), Recent Developments in Technology-Enhanced and Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 145–163). Information Science Reference. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1282-1.ch007
Li, J., & Mak, L. (2022). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students’ learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102712
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
Miller, K. S., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The Psycholinguistic Dimension in Second Language Writing: Opportunities for Research and Pedagogy Using Computer Keystroke Logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x
Miri, F., & Azizi, D. B. (2018). The effect of teaching critical thinking on Iranian EFL learners' essay writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(5), 509.
Mustafa, A., Noor Arbab, A., & Ahmed El Sayed, A. (2022). Difficulties in academic writing in English as a second/Foreign language from the perspective of undergraduate students in higher education institutions in Oman. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.3
Nasution, E. Y., Gunawan, R. G., & Yulia, P. (2020). Pengaruh model Pembelajaran problem based instruction (PBI) terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains, 7(02), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v7i02.2113
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artifcial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Oktaviani, S., Bahrani, B., & Noor, W. N. (2023). Students Perception Toward the Use of Grammarly in English Writing Skill of Fourth Semester English Education Department at UINSI Samarinda in the Academic year 2021/2022. Jurnal SIPPG: Sultan Idris Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 1(1), 135-159.‏
ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795
Parra G., L., & Calero S., X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12214a
Perdana, I., & Farida, M. (2019). Online grammar checkers and their use for EFL writing. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 2(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.20527/jetall.v2i2.7332
Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
Rahma Hakiki, G. N. (2021). Perception of EFL students on the use Grammarly application in writing class. EDUVELOP, 4(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v4i2.891
Rao, P. S. (2017b). Developing Writing Skills among the EFL/ESL Learners”. Research Journal of English. 2(3), 52-63. www.rjoe.org.in
Saeed, M. A., & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2022). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: Factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711
Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020524
Spada, N. (2018) Isolating or integrating attention to form in communicative instruction: a dilemma? Babel, 53(1), 7–13.
Tambunan, A. R., Andayani, W., Sari, W. S., & Lubis, F. K. (2022). Investigating EFL students’ linguistic problems using Grammarly as automated writing evaluation feedback. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46428
Tang, C., & Liu, Y. (2018). Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation. Assessing Writing, 35, 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002
Triana, Y., Sari, I. F., & Apriyanto, S. (2020). Language features and causes of suicide case from forensic linguistics point of wiew. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 7955-7966.
Tu, Y., Zou, D., & Zhang, R. (2020). A comprehensive framework for designing and evaluating vocabulary learning apps from multiple perspectives. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(3), 370. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2020.108199
Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of E-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
Yasmin, F. R., Rahayu, P., & Nazilah, B. M. (2021, October). From EFL Learners Perspective: Does Grammarly as an Online-Proofreader Help them with their Academic Writing? In Undergraduate Conference (UC) 2021.
Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Investigating contextual effects on Iranian EFL learners` mediation and reciprocity in academic writing. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1571289. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1571289
Vidhiasi, D. M., & Haryani, H. (2020). The implementation of Grammarly in error analysis Implementasi Grammarly Dalam error analysis. JURNAL SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI MARITIM, 21(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.33556/jstm.v21i1.248
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English language arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004
Wu, L., Wu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021). L2 Learner Cognitive Psychological Factors About Artificial Intelligence Writing Corrective Feedback. English Language Teaching, 14(10), Article 10. https://doi. org/10.5539/elt. v14n10p70
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002
Zandi, P., & Krish, P. (2017). Enhancing EFL Writing Instruction through Technology in Iran. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(18), 75–83.
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with the teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
Zou, B., Wang, D., & Xing, M. (2015). Collaborative tasks in a Wiki-based environment in EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1001-1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1121878

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics