Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in TEFL, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran

Abstract

As a controversial subject, globalization has affected various aspects of our lives. Today, the intertwined world is run through complicated relationships and the education of competent human capitals has gained more significance than before. Recently, there has been a movement, known as Global Citizenship Education (GCE), toward a pervasive orientation to education in which issues such as Quality Education are the critical goals. The main aim of this study was to explore the extent to which The Iranian National Curriculum, The Doctrine of General Formal Education System and The Fundamental Reform Document of Education promote the GCE goals in formal English language education. Using a multi-concept model based on the GCE goals, the documents were the subject of scrutiny through document analysis. A survey questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were also utilized. Among 198 participants, 12 individuals accepted to be interviewed. The results of the document analysis and the questionnaire approved the documents’ theoretical promotion of the GCE goals. However, they were criticized for being idealistic and incoherent in the interviews and literature review. Also, their appropriate implementation, practical efficiency and convincing educational achievement were disapproved. The study emphasizes global-oriented approaches in the country’s formal education. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Blevins, D. M. (2011). New directions in citizenship education: Globalization, state standards and an ethical/critical social studies curriculum [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Ohio]. The University of Ohio. http://etd.ohiolink.edu
Dogan, D. (2015). The ERASMUS programme in internationalization of Turkish higher education [Master thesis, The University of Ohio]. The University of Ohio. http://etd.ohiolink.edu
Ferguson, G. (2006). Language planning and education. Edinburg University Press.
Ha, Ph. L. (2008). Teaching English as an international language: Identity, resistance and negotiation. Multilingual Matters.
Handa, N. (2018). Education for sustainability through internationalization: Transnational knowledge, exchange and global citizenship. Palgrave MacMillan.
Khor, M. (2000).  Globalization and the south: Some critical issues. Jutaprint.
Kiany, Gh. R., Mirhosseini, S. A., & Navidinia, H. (2010). Foreign language education policies in Iran: Pivotal macro considerations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53(222), 49-70.
Lantz, C., & Davies, I. (2015). Global education in theory. In B. M. Maguth & J. Hilburn (Eds.), The state of global education: Learning with the world and its people. (pp. 41-59). Routledge.
Lewis, S. (2022). Globalization and education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365601992
Marzoghi, R., Aghili, R., & Mehrvarz, M. (2017). A Methodological and Theoretical Analysis and Critique of the Educational Fundamental Transformative Documents of Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Foundations of Education, 6(2), 21-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/fedu.v6i2.53863
Myers. J. P. (2006). Rethinking the social studies curriculum in the context of globalization: Education for global citizenship in the U.S. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(3), 370-394, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473313
Nester, W. R. (2010). Globalization: A short history of the modern world. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pishghadam, R., & Zabihi, R. (2012). Crossing the threshold of Iranian TEFL. Applied Research in English, 1(1), 57-71.
Roberts, M. (2007). Global dimensions of schooling: Implications for internationalizing teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(1), 9-26.
Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Vintage Books.
Sharifian, F. (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Multilingual Matters.
Sun, J. (2013). Globalization and language teaching and learning in China. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE), 2(4), 35-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2013.2404
Tarozzi, M., & Torres, C. A. (2016). Global citizenship education and the crises of multiculturalism: comparative perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic.
Torres, C. A. (2002). Globalization, education, and citizenship: Solidarity versus markets? American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 363-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312039002363
UNESCO. (2000). 2000 Final report. www.unesco.org
UNESCO. (2001). 2001 International conference on education: 46th session. www.unesco.org
UNESCO. (2014). 2014 Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/globalcitizenship-education
UNESCO. (2015). 2015 Building peaceful and sustainable societies: Preparing for post-2015. http://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development
UNESCO. (2015). 2015 Challenges and opportunities in measuring education for sustainable development and global citizenship education. http://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development
UNESCO. (2015). 2015 Global citizenship education: Citizenship education for globalizing societies. http://creativecommons.org/licenses
UNESCO. (2015). 2015 Global citizenship education: Topics and learning and objectives. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002329/232993e.pdf
UNESCO. (2015). 2015 World education forum 2015: Final report. http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-useccbysa-en
UNESCO. (2016). 2016 Schools in action: Global citizens for sustainable development. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/
UNESCO. (2017). 2017 Measuring global citizenship education: A collection of practices and tools. https://www.brookings.edu/about-us/annual-report/.
UNESCO. (2018). 2018 Preparing teachers for global citizenship education: A template. http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-useccbysa-en
Yang, R. (2000). Tensions between the global and the local: A comparative illustration of the reorganisation of China’s higher education in the 1950s and 1990s. Higher Education, 39(3), 319-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003950902434
اعرابی، فرشیده. (١٣٩٧). بررسی اهداف اسناد بالادستی (سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش، نقشه جامع علمی کشور) و مقایسه آن با اهداف اساسنامه انجمن اولیا و مربیان در دوره ابتدایی. سوّمین کنفرانس بین الملّلی، علوم تربیّتی و رفتاری.
حاجی یوسفی، امیرمحمد، افتخاری، اصغر، پوراحمدی، حسین، تاجیک، محمدرضا و .... (١٣٨٨). دولت و جهانی شدن در خاورمیانه. مرکز چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
سلسبیلی، نادر. (١۳٩٢).  برداشت‌های مختلف در تدوین برنامه درسی ملی: تأملی در سند برنامه درسی ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، شماره ١١٨، مهر ٩٢، ٩١-۶۳.
سلسبیلی، نادر. (١۳٩۵).  بررسی و مقایسه سند برنامه درسی ملی تدوین شده جمهوری اسلامی ایران با زیرنظام برنامه درسی در مبانی نظری تحول بنیادین نظام تعلیم و تربیت رسمی و عمومی. فصلنامه پژوهش های کیفی در برنامه درسی، شماره ۵، زمستان ٩۵، ١۴١-١٠٧.
فرهادی، حسین، سجّادی، ف. و هدایتی، ح. (١٣٨٩). تأملاتی در آموزش زبان خارجی در ایران. TESL-EJ مارس، دوره ١٣، شماره ٤.
کیانی، غلامرضا؛ نویدی نیا، حسین و مومنیان، محمد. (١۳٩٠). نقد و بررسی طرح ملی نگاهی دوباره به رویکرد برنامه درسی ملی نسبت به آموزش زبانهای خارجی. فصلنامه پژوه‌ های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی، شماره پیاپی۶، تابستان ١۳٩٠، ٢٠٩-١٨۵.
مهرمحمدی، محمود. (١۳٨٩). نقد و نظری بر نگاشت سوم سند برنامه درسی ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات برنامه درسی ایران، سال پنجم، شماره ١٨، پاییز ١۳٨٩، ۳١-٨