Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of TEFL, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of TEFL, Sistan and Baloochestan University, Iran


Scaffolding entails contingency, denoting teachers’ level adaptation in providing transient support. In this study, a symbiosis of the model of contingent teaching (MCT) and the contingent shift framework (CSF) was utilized. Therefore, 360 elementary and advanced EFL learners took a course and filled out two sets of related questionnaires twice, administered at the outset and the end of the course. The transcribed data including the class interactions and intervention strategies were organized into contingent or non-contingent fragments based on models’ criteria. According to the results of the Wilcoxon rank test and the Paired Sample t-test, there was a significant difference between the results of the pre and post-tests in the two mentioned levels for the two constructs. Furthermore, the results of the Single Sample t-test showed that the CSF was more utilized than the MCT in both levels. Moreover, the intervention strategies of the MCT significantly differed in the two levels. Questioning was a highly used strategy at both levels. Hints and modeling were the least utilized strategies in elementary and advanced levels, respectively. Therefore, such contingent symbiosis could have prolific results in self-regulation and gaining willingness to communicate


Main Subjects

Aregu, B. B. (2013). Self-efficacy, self-esteem and gender as determinants of performance in speaking tasks. Journal of Media and Communication Studies. 5(6), 64-71.DOI: 10.5897/JMCS2013. 0366.
Arkavazi, S., & Nosratinia, M.(2018). Self-regulation and Locus of Control Predicting EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate. ISSN 1799-2591. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 1094-1103, August 2018. DOI:
Artuch-Garde, R., González-Torres, M. d. C., de la Fuente, J., Vera, M. M., Fernández-Cabezas, M., & López-García, M. (2017). Relationship between resilience and self-regulation: a study of Spanish youth at risk of social exclusion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 612. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00612
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019). Adding communicative and affective strategies to an embodied conversational agent to enhance second language learners’ willingness to communicate. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1), 29-57.  
Beers, K., & Probst, R. E. (2017). Disrupting thinking: Why how we read matters: Scholastic New York, NY.
Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. Tesol Quarterly, 48(4), 789-814.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
Davis, E. A. & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 75, p. 265-272
de la Fuente-Arias, J. (2017). Theory of self-vs. externally-regulated learningTM: fundamentals, evidence, and applicability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1675.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non–English major university students. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 197-211. DOI:10.1177/0261927X12438538
Heidari Soureshjani, K. (2013). A study of the effect of self-regulation and the degree of willingness to communicate on oral presentation performance of EFL learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 166-177
Hirata, A. (2010). An exploratory study of motivation and self-regulated learning in second language acquisition: Kanji learning as a task focused approach: a thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Second Language Teaching at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand. Massey University.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Jafarigohar, M., & Mortazavi, M. (2017). The impact of scaffolding mechanisms on EFL learners’ individual and socially shared metacognition in writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 211-225.
Johnson, T., Mikita, C., Rodgers, E., & D’Agostino, J. V. (2020). Scaffolding Self‐Correction During Oral Reading. The Reading Teacher, 73(6), 796-799.
Kang, S.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. Tesol Quarterly, 50(1), 154-180.
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417.
KÖKSAL, D., & DÜNDAR, S. (2018). Developing a scale for self-regulated L2 learning strategy use. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 337-352. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017033805
Latham-Koenig, C. (2013). American file book 1: Oxford University Press.
Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American educational research journal, 38(1), 97-141.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537-564.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
McCroskey, J., & Richmond, V. (2013). Willingness to communicate (WTC). Measurement instrument database for the social science. Retrieved from.
Mertzman, T. (2008). Individualizing scaffolding: teachers' literacy interruptions of ethnic minority students and students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(2), 183-202.
Meskill, C. (2005). Triadic scaffolds: Tools for teaching English language learners with computers. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 46-59.
Miller, D. (2012). Reading with Meaning, 2nd edition: Teaching Comprehension in the Primary Grades (2 ed.): Stenhouse Publishers.
Munezane, Y. (2016). Motivation, ideal self and willingness to communicate as the predictors of observed L2 use in the classroom. EUROSLA Yearbook, 16(1), 85-115.
Nosratinia, M., & Deris, Z. (2015). An exploration into the relationship between EFL learners' self-regulation and willingness to communicate. Theory and practice in language studies, 5(9), 1921-1928.DOI:
Oh, P. S. (2005). Discursive roles of the teacher during class sessions for students presenting their science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1825-1851.
Oxford, R. (2013). Teaching and researching: Language learning strategies. Teaching and Researching: Language Learning Strategies, 1-342. doi:10.4324/9781315838816
Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context: Taylor & Francis.
Oxford University Press. (2019). University of Cambridge., & Association of Language Testers in Asia.
Paul A. Davies, T. F., Kathy Gude, Mary Stephens. (2008). CAE Result: Student's Book (Cambridge Advanced English (Cae) Result) NEW STU Edition: Oxford University Press.
Peng, J.-E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203-213.
Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.
Reigosa, C., & Jiménez‐Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Scaffolded problem‐  solving in the physics and chemistry laboratory: difficulties hindering students’ assumption of  responsibility. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 307-329.
Robinson, P. J. (2013). The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition: Routledge.
Rose, H., Briggs, J. G., Boggs, J. A., Sergio, L., & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, N. (2018). A systematic review of language learner strategy research in the face of self-regulation. System, 72, 151-163.
Salehi, M., & Jafari, H. (2015). Development and validation of an EFL self-regulated learning questionnaire. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 33(1), 63-79. DOI:10.2989/16073614.2015.1023503
Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R., Beasman, J., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2000). Scaffolds for learning to read in an inclusion classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(3), 265-279.           DOI:10.1044/0161-1461.3103.265
Smith, L. A. (2006). Think‐aloud mysteries: Using structured, sentence‐by‐sentence text passages to teach comprehension strategies. The Reading Teacher, 59(8), 764-773.
Taherkhani, R., & Moradi, R. (2020). Modeling the relationships among emotional intelligence, autonomy, self-regulation, willingness to communicate, and reading comprehension ability of Persian foreign language learners: Structural equation modeling. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages Vol. 9, No. 2 (Tome 20), Fall & Winter 2020. DOI: 10.30479/jtpsol.2021.13588.1486
Tseng, W.-T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78-102. DOI:10.1093/applin/ami046
van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206-239.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 193-205.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2014). Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 600-650.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43(5), 615-641.
van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206–239.
Vongsila, V., & Reinders, H. (2016). Making Asian learners talk: Encouraging willingness to communicate. RELC Journal, 47(3), 331-347.
Webb, S., Massey, D., Goggans, M., & Flajole, K. (2019). Thirty-Five Years of the Gradual Release of Responsibility: Scaffolding Toward Complex and Responsive Teaching. The Reading Teacher, 73(1), 75-83.                                                 
Wood, D. (2003). The Why? What? When? and How? of Tutoring: The Development of Helping and Tutoring Skills in Children. Literacy teaching and learning, 7, 1-30. DOI:10.5539/jedp.v3n1p173
Wood, D., Wood, H., & Middleton, D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1(2), 131–147.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66. DOI:10.1111/1540-4781.00136
Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48(3), 362-382.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation Handbook of academic learning (pp. 105-125): Elsevier. DOI:10.1016/B978-012554255-5/50005-3