Alderson, J. C. (1993). The relationship between grammar and reading
in English for academic purposes test battery. In D. Douglas, & C.
Chapelle (Eds.), A new decade of language testing research:
Selected papers from the 1990 Language Testing Research
Colloquium (pp. 203-219). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. (1979). A schema-theoretic view of
reading. In Roy O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse
processing (pp.1-22) . Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing
Corporation.
Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of
basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J.
Davine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second
language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). Some psychological considerations in the
objectives and design of an elementary-school science program.
Science Education , 47(3), 278-284.
Barnitz, J. G. (1986). Toward understanding the effects of crosscultural
schemata and discourse structure on second language
reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 18 (2), 95-
116.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and
social psychology. Oxford: Macmillan.
Berman, R.A. (1984). Syntactic components of the foreign language
reading process. In C.J. Alderson, & A.H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading
in a Foreign Language (pp. 139-156). New York: Longman.
Bossers, B. (1992). Reading in two languages. Unpublished PhD
dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Brisbois, J. E. (1995). Connections between first- and secondlanguage
reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 565-584.
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL
reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
110 Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning.No,8 /Autumn & Winter 2011
Carrell, P. L. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom
implications and applications. The Modern Language Journal,
68,332-343.
Carrell, P. L. (1988 a). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema
interference in ESL reading. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E.
Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, Patricia L. (1988 b). Interactive text processing: implications
for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In P. L. Carrell, J.
Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second
language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, G. (1997). Key concepts in ELT. ELT Journal, 51(1), 86.
Eskey, D. E. (1971). Advanced reading: The structural problem.
English Teaching
Forum, 9(5), 15-19.
Eskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the bottom: an interactive approach to
the language problems of second language readers. In
Patricia L. Carrell., J. Devine, &D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive
approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game.
Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126-135.
Goodman, K. (1988). The reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. D., & D.
E. Eskey (Ed.), Interactive approaches to second language
reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and
second language reading: A component skills analysis of English
reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. Carr, & B. A.
Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills
approaches (pp. 375-421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hyde, C. L. (2002). A comparison of the effect of two types of prereading
vocabulary lists on learner reading comprehension:
The Effect of Grammar vs. Vocabulary … 111
Glossed difficult words vs. key cohesive lexical chains. Retrieved
October 15, 2010, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ALRG/dissertations/Hyde-C-2002.pdf.
Jahangard, A. (2010). Form-focused second language vocabulary as
the predictor of EFL learners’ achievement: A case for translation.
BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and
Neuroscience, 1(4).
Kennedy, E. C. (1974). Methods in teaching developmental reading.
Illinois: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
Lyons, J. (1981). Language and linguistics: An introduction.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, C. (2002). Understanding the process of reading
comprehension. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from the World Wide
Web: http://home.gwu.edu/~cmatt.
Mirhassani, A., & Khosravi, A. A. (2002). Issues on reading
comprehension: Part One. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching
Journal, 16 (65), 12-24.
Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills
in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language
Journal, 87, 261-276.
Noor, N. M. (2006). Reading academic text: Awareness and
experiences among university ESL learners. GEMA OnlineTM
Journal of Language Studies, 6(2), 65-78.
Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (1987). Explanations of reading
comprehension: Schema theory and critical thinking theory.
Teachers College Record, 89 (2), 281-306.
Oller, J. W. (1995). Adding abstract to formal and content schemata:
Results of recent work in peircean semiotics. Applied Linguistics,
16(3), 273-306.
Pulido, D. (2009). Vocabulary processing and acquisition through
reading: Evidence for the rich getting richer. In Z.-H. Han, & N. J.
Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and
112 Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning.No,8 /Autumn & Winter 2011
instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 65-82). Ann Arbor, MI:
The University of Michigan Press.
Ruddell, M.R. (1994). Vocabulary knowledge and comprehension: A
comprehension-process view of complex literacy relationships. In
R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical
models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 414–447). Newark,
DE: International Reading Association.
Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of
syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of
reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24,
99-128.
Singhal, M. (1998). A comparison of L1and L2 reading: Cultural
differences and schema. The Internet TESL Journal: (On-line).
Available: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-ReadingL1L2.html
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model
of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.
Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.
Stæ hr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening,
reading, and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36, 139-152.
Stott, N. (2001). Helping ESL students become better readers: Schema
theory applications and limitations. The Internet TESL Journal:
(On-line). Available: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Stott-Schema.html.
Strother, J., & Ulijn, J. (1987). Does syntactic rewriting affect English
for science and technology text comprehension? In J. Devine, P. L.
Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a
second language (pp. 89-103). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Tudor, L. (1990). Pre-reading format and learner proficiency level in
L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 20,
93-106.
Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use.
The Effect of Grammar vs. Vocabulary … 113
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Widmayer, S.A. (2003). Schema theory: An introduction. Retrieved
February 16, 2010, from the World Wide Web:
http://chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/Knowledgebase/strategies/cogni
tivism/SchemaTheory.
)