Document Type : Research Paper


1 Professor

2 Lecturer


The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of blended learning and multimedia software on Iranian ESP students' vocabulary learning. To this end, 120 Iranian ESP learners were assigned to two groups: the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received instructions through multimedia software while the control group received traditional instructions. The data were collected through a vocabulary posttest and classroom observations. The results indicated the great level of disparity between the two groups of learners regarding their acquisition of new vocabulary - in other words, multimedia software had positive effect on students' vocabulary learning. In addition, learning with technology also showed positive activity engagement. Based on the current study, suggestions were made on how multimedia software can be adopted and incorporated more effectively in ESP classes.


Adair-Hauck, B., Willingham-McLain, L., & Youngs, B. E. (1999). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 296-306.
Anderson, A., Hamilton, R., Hattie, J. (2004). Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, 7, 211-225.
Atai, M. R., & Dashtestani, R. (2011). Iranian English for academic purposes (EAP) stakeholders’ attitudes toward using the Internet in EAP courses for civil engineering students: promises and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2011.627872.
Bagheri, E., Roohani, A., & Nejad Ansari, D. (2012). Effect of CALL-based and non-CALL based methods of teaching on L2 vocabulary learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.3 (4), 744-752.
Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development project. Language Learning and Technology, 9(3), 55-78.
Bismonte, A. R., Foley, C. L., & Petty, J. A. (1994).Effectiveness of the possible sentences vocabulary strategy with middle school students in Guam. Reading improvement 31 (4), 194-199.
Campbell, A. P. (2004). Using live Journal for authentic communication in EFL classes. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from The Internet TESL Journal Web Site:
Campbell, C. A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004).The language teacher in the 21st century. In Fotos & C.M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (p. 134-147). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen, Y. (2005). Computer-mediated communication: the use of CMC to develop EFL learners’ communicative competence. Asian EFL journal, 7(1), 167-182.
Chenoweth, N. A., & Murday, K. (2003).Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 285-314.
Cohen, B., & DePetris, A. (2013).Medical terminology: An illustrated guide (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health.
Dewar, T. & Whittington, D. (2004). Blended Learning Research Report. Retrieved from
Echavez-Solano, N. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enhanced vs. traditional second-semester Spanish language courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Minnesota.
Evans, B. (1978). The power of words in language awareness, (2nd. Edition), New York: St. Martin’s Inc.
Ghabanchi, Z. & Anbarestani, M. (2008).The effect of CALL program on expanding lexical knowledge of EFL Iranian international learning. Journal of Reading Matrix, 8.2, 82-95.
Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk. and C. R.  Graham, (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, (pp. 3-21). Pfeifer, San Francisco: CA.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J, and Valcke, M. (2008).The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509.
Hubbard, P. (2005). A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 351-368.
Lauc, T. Matić, S. Mikelić, N. (2007). Project of developing the multimedia software supporting teaching and learning of English vocabulary. Proceedings of the 1st International scientific conference, The Future of Information Sciences: INFuture2007 – Digital Information and Heritage.
Oh, E., & French, R. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of an introductory instructional technology course. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 253–267.
Osguthorpe, RT & Graham, CR. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
Park, C. N., & Son, J.-B. (2009). Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers’ perceptions and perspectives. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80–101.
Pellow, R. A. (1995). Thermatic teaching of vocabulary and reading comprehension through description of TV movies. Reading Improvement, 23 (3), 130-134.
Pouwels, J. B. (1992). The effectiveness of vocabulary visual aids for auditory and visual foreign language students. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 391- 401.
Rakes, G. C., & Casey, H. B. (2000).An analysis of teacher concerns toward instructional technology. Retrieved August 1, 2013, from
Scida, E. E., & Saury, E. R. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 517-531.
Shahrokni, S. A. (2009). Second language incidental vocabulary learning: The effect of online textual, pictorial, and textual pictorial glosses. TESL-EJ 13.3, 1-17.
Sharma, P. & Barrett, B (2007).Blended Learning. Oxford: Macmillan.
Shin, H.J., & Son, J. B. (2007).EFL teachers' perceptions and perspectives on internet assisted language teaching. CALL-EJ Online, 8 (2), 1-13.
Singh, H. & Reed, C. (2001). A White Paper; Achieving success with blended learning. ASTD State of the Industry Report, American Society for Training and Development. Centra Software.
Son, J.-B., & Robb, T., & Charismiadji, I. (2011). Computer literacy and competency: a survey of Indonesian teachers of English as a foreign language. CALL-EJ, 12(1), 26–42.
Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57–78.
Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. Kogan Page. London: UK.
Thyberg, D. (2010). Multimedia English Language Learning Software. Retrieved from
Tozcui, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17 (5), 473–495.
Watts, S. M., & Bucknam, J. (1996).Using vocabulary studies to teach contextual analysis in grade four. Reading Horizons 37 (2), 170-180.
Warshauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-31.
Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. alexandria, Va: TESOL Publications.