Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994).Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
Anton, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314-342.
Bamberg, M. (2006). Stories, big or small: why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 16, 139-147.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Canagarajah, A.S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. (2000).Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51-68.
Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
Donato, R. (1988).Beyond group: A Psycholinguistic rationale for collectivity in second language learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Delaware.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.). Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56).Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998).Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's "i + 1": Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411-442.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., & Dunsmore, K. (2006).Tenets of sociocultural theory in writing instruction research. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.) Handbook of writing research (pp.208-221).New York: The Guilford Press.
Esquinca, A. (2011). Bilingual college writers’ collaborative writing of word problems. Linguistics and Education, 22,150–167.
Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001).Re-conceptualizing scaffolding and the Zone of Proximal Development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 1–15.
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibbons, P. (2002) Scaffolding language scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.
Grossen, B. (1998). Child-directed teaching methods: A discriminatory practice of Western education. On-line at http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~bgrossen/cdp.htm
Hayes-Conroy, J., & Vanderbeck, R. (2005). Ecological identity work in higher education: theoretical perspectives and a case study. Ethics, Place and Environment, 8(3), 309-329.
Kanno, Y. (2003). Negotiating bilingual and bicultural identities: Japanese returnees betwixt two worlds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (Guest Eds.)(2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities [Special issue]. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2, 4-21.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002).The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37,343–358.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000).Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96.
Lantolf, J. P. (2002). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp.104-114).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 619-632.
Lidz, C. (1991).Practitioner's Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43.
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004).Second language learning theories. London: Hodder Arnold.
Norton, B. (2006). Identity as a sociocultural construct in second language education. TESOL in Context, 7, [Special Issue], 22-33.
Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (1994).Psychometric theory (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 506-517.
Pata, K., Sarapuu, T., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Tutor scaffolding styles of dilemma solving in network-based role-play. Learning and Instruction, 15, 571-587.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham& J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.54-66). New York: The Guilford Press.
Psarou M. K., & Zafiropoulos, C. (2004).Scietific Research: Theory and Applications in Social Sciences. Athens: Tipothito, Dardanos.
Rasku-Puttonen H, Etelapelto A, Arvaja M., & Hakkinen P. (2003). Is successful scaffolding an illusion? Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long term learning project. Instructional Science, 31, 377-393.
Roberts, J. (2007). Capturing values: a triangulation of academic frameworks, concepts of education and the student experience. Paper presented at the ESD: Graduates as Global Citizens Conference, 10-11 September, Bournemouth University.
Rommetveit, R. (1985).Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Cultural, communication and cognition: Vygotskyan perspectives (pp. 183-204).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Samuel, M., & Stephens, D. (2000). Critical dialogues with self: Developing teacher identities and roles—a case study of South African student teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 475–491.
Scarcella, R.C., &Oxford, R.L. (1992).The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Schwartz, S. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 7 - 58.
Seliger, H. W. (1983). Learner interaction in the classroom and its effect on language acquisition. In H.W.Seliger & M.H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp.89-107).Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Serres, M. (2004). The Parasite (trans. Lawrence R. Schehr). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Simon, R. I. (1988). For a pedagogy of possibility. In J. Smyth (Ed.), The critical pedagogy networker, (pp. 1-4). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Simon, R. I. (1995). Face to face with alterity: Postmodern Jewish identity and the eros of pedagogy. In J. Gallop (Ed.), Pedagogy: The question of impersonation (pp. 90–105). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Smith, F. (2006).Ourselves: Why we are who we are: A handbook for educators. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
Storch, N., & Wigglesowrth, G. (2010). Students’ engagement with feedback on writing: The role of learner agency. In R.Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 166-185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Storch, N., &Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In M.P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157-177). London: Multilingual Matters.
Sullivan, P. (1996).Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 115-131). New York: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
Toohey, K. (2000) Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
Van Lier, L. (1996).Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy & authenticity. Harlow Essex: Longman Group Limited.
Villamil, O., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51-75.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Wells, G. (1998). Using L1 to Master L2: A response to Anton and DiCamilla’s ‘‘Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom.’’ Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 343–53.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991).Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445–466.
Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing. 13, 173–201
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976).The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007).Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48, 362-382.