Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Payame Noor University

Abstract

The second half of the twentieth century can be called the age of individualization when individual values and differences are recognized and respected. Intelligence is among the various aspects of individual differences which affect education and language learning. As such, the present study aimed at investigating the relationship between Multiple Intelligence and Reading Comprehension Abilities of Iranian EFL learners. For the purpose of study, 117 senior English students were randomly selected. After administering two types of instruments including MIDAS Adults (Shearer, 1996) and Reading Comprehension Section of TOEFL (2005, Longman), the data were collected and analyzed. The results indicated that all types of the learners’ MI profile have significant relationship with the reading comprehension scores and the Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence is the most significant predictor of the learners’ reading comprehension abilities, while Visual-Spatial and Interpersonal Intelligences are the second and third predictors of the learners’ reading comprehension respectively. Furthermore, Intrapersonal and Kinesthetic Intelligences could not predict the reading comprehension of the learners.

Keywords: Multiple Intelligence, Verbal Intelligence, Visual Intelligence, Interpersonal Intelligence, Musical Intelligence, Kinesthetic Intelligence, Reading Comprehension

Keywords

Akbari, R., & Hosseini, K. (2008). Multiple intelligences and language learning strategies: Investigating possible relations. System, 36(2), 141-155.
Arnold, J. & Fonseca, M. C. (2004). Multiple intelligence theory and foreign language learning: A brain-based perspective. IJES (International Journal of English Studies), 4(1), 119-136.
Brindley, S. (1994). Teaching English. (Ed). New York: Routledge.
Carig, B. (2007). High stakes testing meets multiple intelligences. Education and Social Change, (2007, May), 1-23.
Celce- Morcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreignlanguage. (3rd Ed.). USA: H&H publishers.
Dornyei, Z. & T. Murphy. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fahim, M., Bagherzadeh, M., & Alemi, M. (2010). The relationship between test takers’ multiple intelligences and their performance on reading sections of TOEFL and IELTS.BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1(3), 27-41.
Gaines, D., & Lehmann, D. (2002). Improving student performance in reading comprehension through the use of multiple intelligence. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467515CS511 267. Retrieved January 20, 2014 from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detainmini.jsp? _nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch-SearchValue_0=ED467515&ERICExtSearch SearchType_0=no&accno=ED467515.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. Basic Books: New York.
Hajhashemi, Karim. Akef, Kourosh. and Anderson, Neil. (2012).The relationship between multiple intelligences and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL students. World Applied Sciences Journal,19 (10), 1475-1483.
Hashemi, Akram. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and reading comprehension tasks: An authentic MI theory-based Assessment. Proceedings of the Regional Conference on English Language Teaching and Literature. Islamic Azad University-Roudehen Branch. 54-63.
Heidari, Farrokhlagha. and Khorasaniha,Najme. (2013). Delving into the relationship between LOC, MI, and reading proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4 (1), 89-96.
Jokar, Gholamreza, and Hesabi, Akbar. (2014). The relationship between multiple intelligence types and L2 reading skill among Iranian high school students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research. 3 (2), 108-116.
Kuzniewski, F., Sanderas, M., Smith, G. S., Swanson, S., & Urich, C. (1989). Using multiple intelligences to increase reading comprehension in English and Math. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420839CS013228. Retrieved March 11, 2014 from:
Phakiti, Aek .(2006). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL reading test performance. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, (1), 53-95.
Ozdemir, P., Guneysu, S., & Tekkaya C. (2006). Enhancing learning through multiple intelligences. Educational Research, 40(2), 74-78.
Razmjoo, S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and language proficiency. The Reading Matrix, 8(2),155-174.
Razmjoo, S. A., Sahragard, R., & Sadri, M. (2009). On the relationship between multiple intelligences, vocabulary learning knowledge and vocabulary learning strategies among the Iranian EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal, 3(1), 82-106.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in languageteaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Saricaoglu, A. & Arikan, A. (2009). A study of multiple intelligences, foreign language success and some selected variables. Articles/Makaleler, 5(2),110-122.
Shearer, B. (1996). The MIDAS: A professional manual. Kent, Ohio: MI Research and Consulting, Inc. Retrieved April 12, 2010 from: www.miresearch.org/ files/ Teacher_Development.doc
Shearer, C. B. (2006). Reading skill and multiple intelligences: An investigation into the MI profiles of high school students with varying levels of reading skill. Multiple Intelligences Research and Consulting, Inc. Kent, Ohio. Retrieved May 5, 2010 from: http:/www.miresearch.org/files/Reading_MI.com