Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of English Language and Literature, University of Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of English Language and Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of English Language and Literature, University of Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

It is believed that classroom interaction is essential for learning a second 
language (L2). Studies on teaching second/foreign language present evidence that affirms the significance of interaction in language learning and its function in facilitating learners' attempts to gain competency in an L2. They also consider learners’ affective states and their perceptions of classroom interaction to be as significant as instruction. On the other hand, the notion of willingness to communicate (WTC) in an L2 has attracted interest in L2 research and how to accelerate L2 learners’ WTC is gaining importance day by day. Considering the significance of these two constructs in L2 learning, this article reports on an investigation into EFL learners’ perceptions of class interactions in English language and how these perceptions are related to their WTC. Applying quantitative methods, the study aims to examine how Iraqi EFL learners’ perceptions of interaction inside the class are correlated to their L2 WTC. The data obtained from 112 learners were utilized for analysis. The findings indicated different kinds of learners’ perceptions of class interactions in English, including perceptions of interaction with the teacher, perceptions of interaction with group members, perceptions of interaction in pairs, and perceptions of classroom interaction between others, are positively related to WTC. The findings have implications for research and teaching.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abbuhl, R., Ziegler, N., Mackey, A., & Amoroso, L. (2015). Interaction and learning grammar. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Wiley‐Blackwell.
Alam, M. R., Ansarey, D., Abdul Halim, H., Rana, M. M., Khan Milon, M. R., &Mitu, R. K. (2022). Exploring Bangladeshi university students’ willingness to communicate (WTC) in English classes through a qualitative study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00129-6
Alemi, M., & Pahmforoosh, R. (2013). EFL learners’ willingness to communicate: The interplay between language learning anxiety and language proficiency. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(2), 23–34.
Asmalı, M. (2016). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in Turkish context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 188–195.
Basöz, T., & Erten, I. H. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into the factors influencing EFL learners’ in-class willingness to communication English. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(1), 1–18.
Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x
Cai, M. (2021). The predictability of Chinese English as a foreign language students’ willingness to communicate through teachers’ immediacy and teacher–student rapport. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769424
Celce–Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler & P. S. Jorda (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41–57). Springer.
Chen, Y-S. (2016). The effect of learner–learner interactions on a multiple-choice discourse completion task. Language, Culture, and Social Interaction,9, 55-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S027226312000042X
Dewaele, J. M., & Pavelescu, L. M. (2021). The relationship between incommensurable emotions and willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: a multiple case study. Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach.,15, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1675667
Ding, J. (2021). Exploring effective teacher-student interpersonal interaction strategies in English as a foreign language listening and speaking class. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765496
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second/foreign language learning. In J.P. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second/foreign language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, Ablex.
Do¨rnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Do¨rnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Do¨rnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/136216800125096
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research & language pedagogy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44(3), 449–491.
Fushino, K. (2010). Causal relationships between communication confidence, beliefs about group work, and willingness to communicate in foreign language group work. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 700–724.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reportedL2 use: the Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29-70. [Online] Available: http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/uhwpesl/on-line_cat.html.
Hawkey, R. (2006). Teacher and learner perceptions of language learning activity. ELT Journal, 60(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl004.
Heckel, C., and Ringeisen, T. (2019). Pride and anxiety in online learning environments: achievement emotions as mediators between learners’ characteristics and learning outcomes. J. Compute. Assist. Learn. 35, 667–677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12367
Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational WTC in a second language. System,33(2), 277-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50,154–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.204.
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M., & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. PNAS, 100(15), 9096–9101.
Kuo, I. (2011). Student perceptions of student interaction in a British EFL setting. ELT Journal: English Language Teaching Journal,65(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq063.
Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2classroom. System, 37, 269–285.
Liu, M. H. (2017). Adult Chinese as a second language learners’ willingness to communicate in Chinese: effects of cultural, affective, and linguistic variables. Psychol. Rep. 120, 423–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033294117692808
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreign talk discourse forms and functions of teacher’s questions. In H. W. Seliger &M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in language learning (pp. 268–285). Newbury House.
Lu, Y. W. (2010). Interaction, motivation, and effectiveness (Unpublished MA paper). Ming Chuan University.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Mod. Lang. J. 91, 564–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007. 00623.x
MacIntyre, P. D. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 111–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Cle´ment, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clément, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents and consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47 (2), 215-229.
MacIntyre, P., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52, 537-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00194
MacIntyre, P. D., Do¨rnyei, Z., Cle´ment, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 330224.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami051
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1),16–25.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949009372817
Peng, J. (2014). Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL university classroom: An ecological perspective. Multilingual Matters.
Peng, J. E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communication English. System, 82(s1), 161–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006
Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3–21.
Sun, Y. F. (2008). Motivation to speak: Perception and attitude of non-English major students in Taiwan (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Indiana University.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Rowley, MA.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second/foreign language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M. (1999). Integrating language and content through collaborative tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 44–63.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second/ foreign language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second/foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000090
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second/foreign language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(iii), 320–337.
Van Batenburg, E. L., Oostdam, R. J., Van Gelderen, A. J. S., Fukkink, R. G., & De Jong, N. H. (2019). Oral interaction in the EFL classroom: The effects of instructional focus and task type on learner affect. The Modern Language Journal,103(1), 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12545
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Lang. Learn., 60, 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679922.2009. 00559.x
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Longman.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Wang, C. (2017). Two affective variables and language learners’ perceptions of classroom interaction. The Journal of Asia TEFL,14(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.1.2.16.
Wang, C., & Tseng, W. T. (2020). Toward an Instructional WTC-Mediated Model for L2 Classroom Interaction. Sage Open, 10(3), 1-16.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020943524
Wang, C., Tseng, W. T., Chen, Y. L., & Cheng, H. F. (2019). Classroom interactions in the target language: Learners’ perceptions, willingness to communicate, and communication behavior. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00492-y
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970163001
Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Yu, M. (2009). Willingness to communicate of foreign language learners in a Chinese setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida State University.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Abdi, R. (2011). Willingness to communicate and language learning orientations in Iranian EFL context. International Education Studies, 4(4), 206–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n4p206
Zhou, N. (2015). Oral participation in EFL classroom: Perspectives from the administrator, teachers and learners at a Chinese university. System, 53, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.007.
Ziegler, N., & Bryfonski, L. (2018). Interaction‐driven L2 learning: Advanced learners. In P. A. Malovrh & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 94-113), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.