Document Type : Research Paper


1 English Language and Literature Department, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Iran

2 Foreign Languages Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran


Corrective feedback has been evidenced to be a propitious pedagogical tool to promote second language (L2) knowledge, yet little is known about the role of interactional feedback in maximizing L2 learners’ pragmatic knowledge and their reciprocity patterns to corrective feedback in teacher-student interactions. Therefore, the current study made an attempt to bridge this gap. To do so, twenty (11 male and nine female) intermediate English as a foreign language (EFL) participant with an age range of 19 to 31 were recruited and were provided with recast for their inappropriate request strategies. The participants were assigned to perform requests in various scenarios that varied in terms of power, familiarity, and social distance. To gauge their performance, a pretest and posttest Discourse Completion Test (DCT) was run. The obtained data gave evidence to the efficiency of recast in improving L2 pragmatics. Moreover, classroom interactions were recorded and transcribed to identify the emerging reciprocity patterns. The findings revealed several reciprocity patterns, including repetition of trigger, modification of trigger, acknowledgement, topic continuation, and inability to respond. The findings have implications for L2 teachers and augment our understandings of the role of recast in L2 pragmatics and reciprocity patterns of students.


Main Subjects

Ableeva, R. (2018). Understanding learner L2 development through reciprocity. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 266–281). Routledge.
Alcon Soler, E. (2002). Relationship between teacher-led versus learners’ interaction and the development of pragmatics in the EFL classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 359–377. 
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483.
Bao, R. (2019). Oral corrective feedback in L2 Chinese classes: Teachers’ beliefs versus their practices. System, 82, 140–150.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press.
Bryfonski, L., & Ma, X. (2020). Effects of implicit versus explicit corrective feedback on mandarin tone acquisition in a SCMC learning environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 61–88.
Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100, 102566.
Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford University Press
Farrokh, P., & Rahmani, A. (2017). Dynamic assessment of writing ability in transcendence tasks based on Vygotskian perspective. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2.
Fu, T., & Nassaji, H. (2016). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and feedback perception in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 159–181.
Fukuya, Y. J., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Effects of recasts on EFL learners’ acquisition of
pragmalinguistic conventions of request. Second Language Studies, 21(1), 1–47.
Gass, S. M. (2015). Comprehensible input and output in classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction, (pp. 182–197). John Wiley & Sons.
Guo, X., & Yang, Y. (2018). Effects of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ acquisition of third-person singular form and the mediating role of cognitive style. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 47(4), 841–858.
Ha, X. V., Murray, J. C., & Riazi, A. M. (2021). High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 235–264.
Hadidi, A. (2012). Fostering argumentative writing ability in the zone of proximal development: A dynamic assessment. Paper presented at the Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing Conference, Wilfred Laurier and University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Infante, P., Poehner, M. E. (2022). Mediated development: A nexus of dialogic and material mediation in the second language classroom. In D. K. LaScotte, C. S. Mathieu, & S.S. David, (Eds.) New perspectives on material mediation in language learner pedagogy (pp. 111–130), Springer.
Ioannou, S., & Tsagari, D. (2022). Interactional Corrective Feedback in beginner level classrooms of Greek as a second language: Teachers’ Practices. Research Papers in Language Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 7–25.
Kartchava, E. (2019). Noticing oral corrective feedback in the second language classroom: background and evidence. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K.R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishers.
Khatib, M. & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2011). The effectiveness of ZPD-wise explicit/implicit expert peers and co-equals' scaffolding in ILP development. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 49–76.
Khezrlou, S. (2019). Task repetition and corrective feedback: The role of feedback types and structure saliency. English Teaching & Learning, 43(2), 213–233.
Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (Eds.). (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox Publishing.
Li, H., & Iwashita, N. (2021). The role of recasts and negotiated prompts in an FL learning context in China with non-English major university students. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 209–233.
Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). Newbury House.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: a series of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford University Press
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Routledge.
Milad, N., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2021). Libyan EFL learners’ attitudes towards oral interactional corrective feedback: A case of Sirte University. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53–70.
Mirzaee, M., Gharibeh, S. G., & Mohammadnia, Z. (2016). Pragmatic development through online and class-based recasts: Learners’ perception and individual differences. Korea Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages12(2), 157–180.
Mirzaei, M. & Saeedian, A. (in press). Developing EFL teachers’ cognition of corrective feedback using a task-based approach. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 1–20.
Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2010). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34–51.
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2018). Pragmatic development in the instructed context: A longitudinal investigation of L2 email requests. Pragmatics, 28(2), 217–252.
Nguyen, M. T. T., Do, H. T., Pham, T. T., & Nguyen, A. T. (2018). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 pragmatics: An eight-month investigation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(3), 345–375.
Nguyen, T. T. M., Do, T. T. H., Nguyen, A. T., & Pham, T. T. T. (2015). Teaching email requests in the academic context: a focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24(2), 169–195.
Nipaspong, P., & Chinokul, S. (2010). The role of prompts and explicit feedback in raising EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 101–146
Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2014). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337–357.
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018). Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68(2), 507–545.
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2007). Modified output of Japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor vs. feedback types [Master's thesis, McGill University].
Shao, J. (2022). Effectiveness of explicit and implicit corrective feedback in a video-based SCMC environment. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(3), 15–28.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 development. Pragmatics, 16(4), 513–533.
Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. 
Taguchi, N. (2015). “Contextually” speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class, and online. System, 48, 3–20.
Taguchi, N. (2022). Teaching and learning pragmatics. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning (pp. 499–512). Routledge.
Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 393–417.
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd edition). Sage.
Vakili, S., & Ebadi, S. (2019). Investigating contextual effects on Iranian EFL learners’ mediation and reciprocity in academic writing. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1571289.
Vidal, C. P., & Shively, R. L. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 355–371). Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
Wang, W., & Li, S. (2021). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 35–50.
Yang, Y., & R. Lyster. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 235–262.
Yousefi, M., & Nassaji, H. (2021). Corrective feedback in second language pragmatics: A review of research. TESL-EJ, 25(1), 1–14.
Zhang, Y. (2021). Combining computer-mediated communication with data-driven instruction: EFL learners’ pragmatic development of compliment responses. System103, 102624.
Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2022). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 361–381.