Document Type : Research Paper


English Language & Literature Department, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.


Mastery of English phrasal verbs is regarded as a stumbling block for English language learners, even at advanced levels. Possible sources of difficulty can be a lack of clear meaning and the random nature of particles. The lack of an organized approach to present phrasal verbs to the learners might be a factor that could exacerbate the situation of learning them. This study takes this issue as its point of departure. It investigates whether employing radial categories, conceptual categories with one prototypical concept and some peripheral members that are organized around it, is influential in the learning and long-term retention of these verbs. Moreover, the effect of employing radial categories to teach PVs on learners' cognitive load is investigated. For this purpose, 60 intermediate high school students in 10th and 11th grade were assigned to two groups, one experimental and one control group, each containing 30 students. The study results indicated that the experimental group learners who were taught phrasal verbs using radial categories outperformed control group learners who were taught using a traditional approach. This result suggests that radial categories may help facilitate learning phrasal verbs.


Main Subjects

Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied linguistics, 21(4), 553-571.
Brugman, C., & Lakoff, G. (2006). Radial network. Geeraerts, 2006, 109-140.
Condon, N. (2008). How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. Applications of cognitive linguistics, 6, 133.
Condon, N., & Kelly, P. (2002). Does Cognitive Linguistics have anything to offer English language learners in their efforts to master phrasal verbs? ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 137(1), 205-231.
Cornell, A. (1985). Realistic goals in teaching and learning phrasal verbs. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23(4), 269-280.
Csábi, S. (2004). A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching, 233-256.
Danesi, M. (1993). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension. Language, communication and social meaning, 489-500.
Farsani, H. M., Moinzadeh, A., & Tavakoli, M. (2012). Mnemonic Effectiveness of CL-motivated Picture-elucidation Tasks in Foreign Learners' Acquisition of English Phrasal Verbs. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(3).
Geeraerts, D. (1997). Diachronic prototype semantics. A contribution to historical lexicology.
Ghabanchi, Z., & Goudarzi, E. (2012). Avoidance of phrasal verbs in learner English: A study of Iranian students. World Journal of English Language, 2.
Janda, L. A. (2015). Cognitive linguistics in the year 2015. Cognitive Semantics, 1(1), 131-154.
Kovecses, Z., & Szabco, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied linguistics, 17(3), 326-355.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago press.
Lamb, S. M. (1999). Pathways of the brain: The neurocognitive basis of language (Vol. 170). John Benjamins Publishing.
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction (Vol. 13). Oxford University Press Oxford.
Lin, L., Atkinson, R. K., Christopherson, R. M., Joseph, S. S., & Harrison, C. J. (2013). Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? Computers & Education, 67, 239-249.
Lindner, S. (1981). A lexico-semantic analysis of verb-particle constructions with up and out. San Diego: University of California dissertation.
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Springer.
Littlemore, J., & MacArthur, F. (2012). Figurative extensions of word meaning: How do corpus data and intuition match up. Frequency effects in language representation, 2, 195.
Mahpeykar, N. (2008). An analysis of native and non-native speakers’ use of the word out in MICASE. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429-434.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning (Vol. 3).
Palash, F. (2017). A Corpus Based Study of the Use of Phrasal Verbs in Iranian EFL Students' Writing [M.A, Persian Gulf University].
Quick Placement Test. (2020). In: Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 104(3), 192.
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2008). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds: A cognitive approach. Walter de Gruyter.
Sadri, E., & Talebinejad, M. R. (2014). Teaching Phrasal Verbs: A Fresh View from Cognitive Linguistics. The Iranian EFL Journal, 17, 287.
Sadri, E., & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2013). Contribution of Cognitive Linguistics to TEFL: Presenting conceptual meaning in phrasal verbs. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 3(3), 194-207.
Side, R. (1990). Phrasal verbs: Sorting them out. ELT Journal 42/2. ( Oxford University Press)
Sinclair, J. (1989). Collins Cbuild Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. Collins Publishers.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296.
Thom, D. (2017). A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to Phrasal Verbs: A Teacher's Guide.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2004). Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation. Studies in linguistic motivation, 157-192.
Van Gerven, P., Paas, F. G., Van Merriënboer, J., & Schmidt, H. (2002). Cognitive load theory and aging: Effects of worked examples on training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 87-105.