Document Type : Research Paper


English Language & Literature Department, University of Semnan, Semnan, Iran


Online discussion forums (ODFs) offer students and teachers the opportunity to harness the endless power of the internet for educational purposes. This study investigates the impact of Edmodo as an asynchronous ODF on six of the most recurring reading comprehension skills in the TOEFL iBT test among Iranian learners. Online and offline treatments were given to 26 students in the experimental group and only offline treatments to 33 students in the control group. The statistical analysis of the data represents a large effect size (Partial η2=.234; r=.826; Partial η2=.397; r=.661) for identifying factual information, making inferences, guessing vocabulary from context, and inserting texts in the passage skills respectively, a moderate effect size (r=.363) for the understanding the rhetorical purpose of the passage, and a weak effect size (r=.156) for the identifying referential relationships between the words in the passage skills. The results tell us that Edmodo is effective in teaching reading comprehension skills by overcoming the usual time constraints and offering students autonomy in going online at the most convenient time and place. Finally, the findings are valuable for educational policymakers, curriculum designers, materials developers, language instructors, and language learners.


Main Subjects

Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The reading teacher61(5), 364-373.
Akbari, J., Tabrizi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual vs. non-virtual teaching in improving reading comprehension of Iranian undergraduate EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education22(2), 272-283.
Anya. (2019). About. Retrieved September 17, 2020, from
Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning and Instructional Tools: A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Students Use of Online Tools. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 222-226.
Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. In Proceedings of regional conference on knowledge integration in ICT Vol. 10, pp. 454-466.
Behjat, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Blended learning: A ubiquitous learning environment for reading comprehension. International Journal of English Linguistics2(1), 97.
Bower, B. L. & Hardy, K. P. (2004). From correspondence to cyberspace: Changes and challenges in distance education. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2004(128), 5-12.
Brush, A. J., Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A., & Gupta, A. (2002). Supporting interaction outside of class: anchored discussions vs. discussion boards. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 425-434). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Camarero, C., Rodríguez, J., & José, R. S. (2012). An exploratory study of online forums as a collaborative learning tool. Online Information Review36(4), 568-586.
Davidson-Shivers, G., Muilenberg, L., & Tanner, E. (2000). Synchronous and Asynchronous Discussion: What Are the Differences in Student Participation? In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 267-271). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Delacruz, S. (2013). Online reading response using Edmodo. The Florida Reading Journal, 49 (2), pp. 9-12.
Delahunty, J. (2018). Connecting to learn, learning to connect: Thinking together in asynchronous forum discussion. Linguistics and Education, 46, 12-22. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.003
Durairaj, K., & Umar, I. N. (2015). A proposed conceptual framework in measuring social interaction and knowledge construction level in asynchronous forum among university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences176, 451-457.
Dzubinski, L. (2014). Teaching presence: Co-creating a multi-national online learning community in an asynchronous classroom. Online Learning, 18(2).
Educational Testing Service. (2015). Official TOEFL iBT tests (2nd ed., Vol. 1). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Educational Testing Service. (2017). The official guide to the TOEFL test (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Gao, F., & Wong, D. (2008). Student engagement in distance learning environments: A comparison of threaded discussion forums and text-focused Wikis. First Monday13(1).
Ghazizadeh, T., & Fatemipour, H. (2017). The effect of blended learning on EFL Learners’ reading proficiency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 606.
Goertzen, P., & Kristjánsson, C. (2007). Interpersonal dimensions of community in graduate online learning: Exploring social presence through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 212-230. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.06.005
Grabe, W. (2012). Reading in a second language moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and Researching: Reading. Old Tappan: Taylor and Francis.
Hourdequin, P. (2014). Edmodo: A Simple Tool for Blended Learning. The language Teachers. Japan Association for Language Teaching, 38.
Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of abnormal psychology71(1), 17.
Kheirzadeh, S., & Birgani, M. B. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of blended learning in improving reading comprehension among Iranian EFL students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and language research5(1), 106-120.
Kongchan, C. (2012). How a non-digital-native teacher makes use of Edmodo. Retrieved from www.conference.pixel-online.netf
Kongchan, C. (2013). How Edmodo and google docs can change traditional classrooms. Paper presented at The European Conference on Language Learning 2013 Official Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from
Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society12(4), 282-293.
Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks11(2), 27-42.
Mohamad, M., Hussin, S., Amir, Z., Yaacob, A., Kummin, S., & Zahidi, A. (2012). The Use of Asynchronous Forum to Enhance Reading Comprehension of Distance Learners. Asian Social Science, 8(15), 124-135. doi:10.5539/ass.v8n15p124
Mohamad, M., Omar, A., & Mansor, A. Z. (2013). Asynchronous Forum as a Discussion Tool in a Preparatory Reading Course for First Year Distance Learners. Asian Social Science, 9(13), 53-62. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n13p53
Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education16(2), 99-113.
Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International journal of instructional media29(1), 69-77.
Phillips, D. (2015). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL iBT test. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Pratama, E. Y. (2015). The implementation of blended learning method using Edmodo (a social networking site) in teaching reading comprehension. In International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, & Education. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rad, M. R. (2018). The effect of Moodle-mediated instruction on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Scientific Research1(3), 70-78.
Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology13(3), 201-218.
Salmon, G., & Angood, R. (2013). Sleeping with the enemy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 916-925. doi:10.1111/bjet.12097
Salter, N. P., & Conneely, M. R. (2015). Structured and unstructured discussion forums as tools for student engagement. Computers in Human Behavior46, 18-25.
Salter, S., Douglas, T., & Kember, D. (2017). Comparing face-to-face and asynchronous online communication as mechanisms for critical reflective dialogue. Educational Action Research25(5), 790-805.
Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2008). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Stuttgart: Macmillan.
Sholihah, I., & Retnanindyah, P. (2019). The reading based instruction to foster learner autonomy in an EFL-learning community. Journal of Education and Development7(2), 50-54.
Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International journal of education and development using ICT3(2), 57-67.
Thomas, E. V. & Biriyai, A. H. (2014). Online discussion forum: A tool for effective student-teacher interaction. International Journal of Applied Science- Research and Review, 1(3), 111-116.
Thongmak, M. (2013). Social network system in classroom: antecedents of Edmodo© adoption. Journal of E-learning and Higher Education2013(1), 1-15.
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. New York: Longman.
Warawudhi, R. (2017). The Evaluation of Edmodo in Business Reading Class. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(2), 153-158. doi:10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.2.858
Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: Education for the internet age. London: Routledge.
Whittaker, C. (2013). Introduction. In B. Tomlinson, Blended learning in English language teaching: course design and implementation (pp. 11-23). London: British Council.
Wikle, J. S., & West, R. E. (2019). An analysis of discussion forum participation and student learning outcomes. International Journal on E-Learning 18(2): 205–28.
Williams, E., & Moran, C. (1989). Reading in a foreign language at intermediate and advanced levels with particular reference to English. Language Teaching, 22(4), 217-228.
Yagci, T. (2015). Blended Learning via Mobile Social Media & Implementation of “Edmodo” in Reading Classes. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(4), 41-47. doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.4p.41
Zahedi, Z., & Tabatabaei, O. (2015). The effect of blended teaching on reading strategy use by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research3(11), 25-38.
Zarei, A., & Pedram, S., J. (2018). Reading micro skills: Does gender make a difference? Scholars’ Press.