Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

English Language and Literature Department, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Despite extensive studies concerning written error correction, it is imperative that more research be conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of error correction on improving L2 writing. Driven by this gap, this study aimed to examine whether unfocused direct and indirect types of written corrective feedback had any impact on the writing accuracy of the Iranian English language learners’ new compositions. Through the random matching technique, ninety Iranian English language learners from seven foreign language centers in southwestern Iran were split into two groups for treatment and one group for control. As part of the evaluation, a writing test was utilized to determine whether the learners had improved their writing accuracy due to the treatment. The results showed that the participants in both treatment groups improved their writing accuracy, though the learning gains from both treatment were not significantly different. This study concludes with some implications for teachers regarding their use of appropriate types of written error correction. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on the language learning potential of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37, 322-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.12.006
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective
feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effects of grammar correction in L2 writing: Not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.005
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
Corrigan, A., Dobson, B., Kellman, E., Spaan, M. & Tyma, S. (2010). Michigan Examination for the Certificate of Proficiency in English. Ann Arbor: Testing and Certification Division, the University of Michigan.
Crosthwaite, P. (2017). Does EAP writing instruction reduce L2 errors? Evidence from a longitudinal corpus of L2 EAP essays and reports. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56, 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0129
DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Diab, N. M. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
Ellis, R. (2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431-463. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml022
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6
Ferris, D. R. (2004). ‘The ‘‘Grammar Correction’’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005
Gad, E. E., Li, Y., Kliewer, J., Langberg, M., Jiang, A. A., & Bruck, J. (2016). Asymmetric error correction and flash-memory rewriting using polar codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62, 4024–4038. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2016.2539967
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Jamalinesari A., Rahimib F., Gowharyb H., & Azizifar A. (2015). The effects of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students’ writing. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 192, 116 – 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018
Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it's so hard”: A novice teacher's written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189
Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009
Lee, I. (2019). Teacher frequently asked questions about focused written corrective feedback. TESOL Journal, 10(3), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.427
Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
Manchón, R. M., & Cerezo, L. (2018). Writing as language learning. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. New York: Wiley.
Polio, C. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47, 101-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.31997003
Polio, C., Fleck, N., & Leder, N. (1998). “If only I had more time”: ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4
Ruegg, R. (2015). The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students’ writing ability. Linguistics and Education, 29, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.001
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2010). The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990489
Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written corrective feedback and revision on learners' accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64, 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12029
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for ‘‘the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: a response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80124-6
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001