Agampodi, S. (2013). What are the most popular reasons editors usually reject your paper for? Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_are_the_most_popular_reasons_editors_usually_reject_your_paper_for/520bb222d039b1a219c3b72c/citation/download.
Atai, M. R., Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2018). Conceptions of research publication among Iranian doctoral students of applied linguistics: Cherish the wish to publish or rush to perish. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 29-65.
Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 1-22.
Bordage, G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Academic Medicine Journal, 76(9), 889-896.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Campanario, J. M., & Acedo, E. (2007). Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 734-743.
Chien, S. C. (2019). Writing for scholarly publication in English for Taiwanese researchers in the field of English teaching. SAGE Open, 9(3), 1-15.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA Pearson.
Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Second Language Writing, 18(1), 1-16.
Giraldo, F. (2019). An English for Research Publication Purposes course: Gains, challenges, and Perceptions. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 18, 198-220.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5-22.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Jafari, S., Jafari, S., & Kafipour, R. (2018). English article writing of Iranian doctoral students. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(9), 1251-1256.
Khadilkar, S. S. (2018). Rejection blues: Why do research papers get rejected? The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 68(4), 239-241.
Khatri, N., Varma, A., & Budhwar, P. (2017). Commonly observed shortcomings in manuscripts submitted to management journals. IIMB management review, 29(3), 203-209.
Klimas, J. (2015). Fifty shades of rejection. UniversityAffairs.ca. Retrieved from https://www.universityaffairs.ca/opinion/the-black-hole/fifty-shades-of-rejection/
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2011). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mansouri Nejad, A., Qaracholloo, M., & Rezaei, S. (2020). Iranian doctoral students’ shared experience of English-medium publication: the case of humanities and social sciences. The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 80(2), 255-271.
McGrath, (2014). Parallel language use in academic and outreach publication: A case study of policy and practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 5–15.
McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (2018). Conceptualizations of language errors, standards, norms and nativeness in English for research publication purposes: An analysis of journal submission guidelines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 1-11.
Mukherjee, D. (2018, March 7). 11 reasons why research papers are rejected [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://blog.typeset.io/11-reasons-why-research-papers-are-rejected-3e272b633186
Mungra, P., & Webber, P. (2010). Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments. English for Specific Purposes, 29(1), 43-53.
Nezakatgoo, B. & Fathi, J. (2019). Second language writing through blogs: An investigation of learner autonomy. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 11(2), 131-160.
Pierson, D. J. (2004). The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication, Respiratory care. 49(10), 1246-1252.
Rezaei, S., & Seyri, H. (2019). Iranian doctoral students’ perceptions of publication in English. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(4), 941-954. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2019-0040
Saeedi, Z., & Hossein-Gholipour, B. (2019). Cross disciplinary rhetorical-linguistic variations in Physical Education research article Abstracts in English as a lingua franca for academia context. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 64-85.
Schuler, E. (2013). An empirical study of Chinese subsidiaries’ decision-making autonomy in Germany. Asian Business & Management, 12, 321–350.
Shohamy, E. (2008). Language policy and language assessment: The relationship. Current Issues in Language Planning, 9(3), 363-373.
Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: the case of the submission letter. In Ventola, E; Mauranen, A. (Eds). Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tahririan, M. H., & Sadri, E. (2013). Peer reviewers’ comments on research articles submitted by Iranian researchers. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 32(3), 107-123.
Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 250–263.
Von Elm, E., Costanza, M. C., Walder, B., & Tramèr, M. R. (2003). More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3(1), 12–22. Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2288/3/12. Accessed August 11, 2004
Wincka, J.C., Fonsecab, J.A., Azevedob, L.F., Wedzichac, J.A. (2011). To publish or perish: How to review a manuscript. Rev Port Pneumol. 17(2), 96-103.
Zare, J., Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V., Ketabi, S., & Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki, Z. (2016). English for research publication purposes: The case of scholarly peer review comments. Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, (32), 153-177.
Zhang, H., Patton, D., Kenney, M. (2013). Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 projects. Research Policy, 42(3), 765–775.
Zheng, Y., & Guo, X. (2018). Publishing in and about English: Challenges and opportunities of Chinese multilingual scholars’ language practices in academic publishing. Language Policy, 18(1), 107–130.