Ahmadian, M. J. (2016). Task-based language teaching and learning, The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 377-380.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189-208.
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baralt, M. (2010). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
Bao, R. & Du, X. (2015). Implementation of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a foreign language: Benefits and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2015.1058392
Bygate, M. (2015). Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching. The Language Learning Journal. 44(4), 381-400.
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task Performance. System, 72, 85-98.
Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 197–223.
Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(6), 445-464.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, R., Baron, J., & Levkina, M. (2011). Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes. In P. Robinson (Ed.). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 105–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jung, J. (2018). Effects of task complexity and working memory capacity on L2 reading comprehension. System, 74, 21-37
Khatib, M., Farahanynia, M., (2020). Planning conditions (strategic planning, task repetition, and joint planning), cognitive task complexity, and task type: Effects on L2 oral performance, System. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102297
Kim, Y. (2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners' question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 627-658.
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549-581.
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2011). Task complexity, language anxiety, and the development of the simple past. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 287-306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2011). Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 267-285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. H. Foster–Cohen, M. P. Garcia Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 5 (pp. 195-222). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task Complexity and Linguistic Performance in L2 Writing and Speaking. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91-104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp.77-99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mackey, A., Philip, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 181-209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Task complexity and interaction (combined) effects on task based performance in Dutch as a second language. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 164-190.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Orangi, M., Atefvahid, M., & Ashayeri, H. (2002). Standardization of the revised Wechsler memory scale in Shiraz (Persian). Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 7(4), 56-66.
Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7-32.
Rahimi, M. & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on l2 argumentative writing production, Discourse Processes, 55(8), 726-742.
Revesz, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95, 162-181.
Revesz, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62(1), 93-132.
Revesz, A. Kourtali, N. E. & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on l2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67(10), 208-241.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–105.
Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 193-213.
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis on language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
Robinson, P. (2015). The cognition hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, (pp. 125-151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistic, 17, 38-62.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance: task-based language teaching (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34-49.
Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Patten, B. (2007). Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. Vanpatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 115-135). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Scott Poole, M. (1988). Usinga GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463–478.
Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler memory scale-revised manual. New York: Psychological Cooperation Inc.
Zalbidea, J. (2017). One task fits all? The role of task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335-352.
)