The impact of portfolios and conferencing on Iranian EFL learners’ writing skill

Alderson, J. C. (1993). The relationship between grammar and reading

in English for academic purposes test battery. In D. Douglas, & C.

Chapelle (Eds.), A new decade of language testing research:

Selected papers from the 1990 Language Testing Research

Colloquium (pp. 203-219). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. (1979). A schema-theoretic view of

reading. In Roy O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse

processing (pp.1-22) . Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing

Corporation.

Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of

basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J.

Davine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second

language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ausubel, D. P. (1963). Some psychological considerations in the

objectives and design of an elementary-school science program.

Science Education , 47(3), 278-284.

Barnitz, J. G. (1986). Toward understanding the effects of crosscultural

schemata and discourse structure on second language

reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 18 (2), 95-

116.

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and

social psychology. Oxford: Macmillan.

Berman, R.A. (1984). Syntactic components of the foreign language

reading process. In C.J. Alderson, & A.H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading

in a Foreign Language (pp. 139-156). New York: Longman.

Bossers, B. (1992). Reading in two languages. Unpublished PhD

dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

Brisbois, J. E. (1995). Connections between first- and secondlanguage

reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 565-584.

Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL

reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.

110 Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning.No,8 /Autumn & Winter 2011

Carrell, P. L. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom

implications and applications. The Modern Language Journal,

68,332-343.

Carrell, P. L. (1988 a). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema

interference in ESL reading. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E.

Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carrell, Patricia L. (1988 b). Interactive text processing: implications

for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In P. L. Carrell, J.

Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second

language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cook, G. (1997). Key concepts in ELT. ELT Journal, 51(1), 86.

Eskey, D. E. (1971). Advanced reading: The structural problem.

English Teaching

Forum, 9(5), 15-19.

Eskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the bottom: an interactive approach to

the language problems of second language readers. In

Patricia L. Carrell., J. Devine, &D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive

approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game.

Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126-135.

Goodman, K. (1988). The reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. D., & D.

E. Eskey (Ed.), Interactive approaches to second language

reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and

second language reading: A component skills analysis of English

reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. Carr, & B. A.

Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills

approaches (pp. 375-421). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Hyde, C. L. (2002). A comparison of the effect of two types of prereading

vocabulary lists on learner reading comprehension:

The Effect of Grammar vs. Vocabulary … 111

Glossed difficult words vs. key cohesive lexical chains. Retrieved

October 15, 2010, from the World Wide Web:

http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ALRG/dissertations/Hyde-C-2002.pdf.

Jahangard, A. (2010). Form-focused second language vocabulary as

the predictor of EFL learners’ achievement: A case for translation.

BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and

Neuroscience, 1(4).

Kennedy, E. C. (1974). Methods in teaching developmental reading.

Illinois: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.

Lyons, J. (1981). Language and linguistics: An introduction.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Matthews, C. (2002). Understanding the process of reading

comprehension. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from the World Wide

Web: http://home.gwu.edu/~cmatt.

Mirhassani, A., & Khosravi, A. A. (2002). Issues on reading

comprehension: Part One. Roshd Foreign Language Teaching

Journal, 16 (65), 12-24.

Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills

in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language

Journal, 87, 261-276.

Noor, N. M. (2006). Reading academic text: Awareness and

experiences among university ESL learners. GEMA OnlineTM

Journal of Language Studies, 6(2), 65-78.

Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (1987). Explanations of reading

comprehension: Schema theory and critical thinking theory.

Teachers College Record, 89 (2), 281-306.

Oller, J. W. (1995). Adding abstract to formal and content schemata:

Results of recent work in peircean semiotics. Applied Linguistics,

16(3), 273-306.

Pulido, D. (2009). Vocabulary processing and acquisition through

reading: Evidence for the rich getting richer. In Z.-H. Han, & N. J.

Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and

112 Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning.No,8 /Autumn & Winter 2011

instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 65-82). Ann Arbor, MI:

The University of Michigan Press.

Ruddell, M.R. (1994). Vocabulary knowledge and comprehension: A

comprehension-process view of complex literacy relationships. In

R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical

models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 414–447). Newark,

DE: International Reading Association.

Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of

syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of

reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24,

99-128.

Singhal, M. (1998). A comparison of L1and L2 reading: Cultural

differences and schema. The Internet TESL Journal: (On-line).

Available: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Singhal-ReadingL1L2.html

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model

of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.

Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.

Stæ hr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening,

reading, and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36, 139-152.

Stott, N. (2001). Helping ESL students become better readers: Schema

theory applications and limitations. The Internet TESL Journal:

(On-line). Available: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Stott-Schema.html.

Strother, J., & Ulijn, J. (1987). Does syntactic rewriting affect English

for science and technology text comprehension? In J. Devine, P. L.

Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a

second language (pp. 89-103). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Tudor, L. (1990). Pre-reading format and learner proficiency level in

L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 20,

93-106.

Widdowson, H. G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use.

The Effect of Grammar vs. Vocabulary … 113

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Widmayer, S.A. (2003). Schema theory: An introduction. Retrieved

February 16, 2010, from the World Wide Web:

http://chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/Knowledgebase/strategies/cogni

tivism/SchemaTheory.