Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate professor of TEFL , university of Tabriz

Abstract

Individual differences have always been a key element in the success and failure of learners in language classrooms. Learners come to EFL classes with various learning styles and teachers utilize different methodologies targeting different needs of the learners which may have important effects on the quality of the learning environment. In this study a comparison is made between learning styles and teaching methodologies to figure out whether there is any consistency between the two. The participants in this survey study are 108 EFL learners and 108 teachers from private institutes. The instruments for gathering data are two questionnaires, one for learning style (Honey & Mumford, 2006) and the other for teaching style (Grasha, 1996). The results of this study revealed that not only there is little consistency between learning styles and teaching methodologies but also there is not a suitable way of measuring learning proficiency in language classes. In many EFL classes, there is little chance for feedback and a traditional paper-pencil evaluation is still on the stage in some classes. The paper ends with addressing the relevant pedagogical implications.

Keywords

Black, P., & William, D. (1998).Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7-73.
Blum, R. E. (1984). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258).New York:Greenwood Press.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Cooper, D. E. (2001). In J. A. Palmer, Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. NY: Routledge Publication.
Dawson, R. (1993). Confucius: The Analects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. San Bernardino, CA: Alliance Publishers.
Honey, P., Mumford, A. (2006). Learning Styles Questionnaire: 80-Item Version. London: Peter Honey Publications
Huang, C. (1997). The Analects of Confucius (Lun Yu): A Literal Translation with an Introduction and Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching and skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
88 Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning.No,8 /Autumn & Winter 2011
Millrood, R. (2004). The role of NLP in teachers’ classroom discourse. ELT Journal, 58(1),28-37.
Richards, J. C. (2002). Theories of teaching in language teaching. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology ofcurrent practices. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Rowe, C. J. (2001). Socrates. In J. A. Palmer, Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. NY: Routledge Publication.
Seraphine, C. L. (2001). Aristotle. In J. A. Palmer, Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. NY: Routledge Publication.
Shen, J. (2001). Confucius. In J. A. Palmer, Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. NY: Routledge Publication.
Tavil, H. A. (2001). Al-Ghazzali. In J. A. Palmer, Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. NY: Routledge Publication.
Thornbury, S. (2001). The unbearable lightness of EFL. ELT Journal, 55(4), 391-402.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zahorik, J. A. (1986). Acquiring teaching skills. Journal of Teacher Education (March-April), 21-25.