<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7995</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>23</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>On The Relationship between Test-Taking Strategies and EFL Reading Performance</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>بررسی رابطه میان راهکارهای پاسخ به آزمون و عملکرد در آزمون خواندن و درک مطلب</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>189</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>219</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8933</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nava</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nourdad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of EFL, University of Tabriz</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Parviz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ajideh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of EFL, University of Tabriz</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>To succeed in tests does not require only content knowledge.   Test-taking strategies are other factors which help students to achieve high scores in tests. The present mixed-method study set out to examine the relationship between test-taking strategies and reading test performance. To achieve the objectives of the study, a reading comprehension test, and a 35-item Likert type strategy questionnaire were given to 214 male and female university students. Analysis of the gathered data revealed that there was a positive relationship between test-taking strategies and reading test performance and that successful, moderately, successful, and unsuccessful test-takers differed in their use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies. To gain an in depth view on strategy use pattern of the test-takers, retrospective interviews along with think-aloud protocols were applied which revealed the use of metacognitive test-taking strategies more than cognitive ones. These findings can have beneficial implications for language testers, teachers, learners, and course developers.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Test-taking strategies</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cognition</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Metacognition</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reading comprehension</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Test performance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_8933_3b0d8f3e639b850272872847729f1f7d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
