<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7995</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>7</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Avoiding Prolixity in Academic Prose; the Use of Quantity Metadiscourse in Research Articles</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>جلوگیری از اطاله کلام در متون علمی: 
کاربرد فراگفتمان کمیت در مقالات پژوهشی</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>17</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">617</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abdi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant profesor , university of Mohaghegh Ardabili</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>As part of a wider attempt to bestow the spirit of scholarly prose upon the research articles’ rhetorical structure, academic writers invariably take advantage of quantity metadiscourse markers to avoid prolixity and live up to the implicit and explicit maxims of quantity category as suggested in Gricean CP and similar models.  In order to develop a clear understanding of quantity strategies distribution in academic prose, 120 research articles were selected from among recently published journals in &lt;em&gt;Sciencedirect&lt;/em&gt; database. The articles were selected equally from two disciplines in social sciences (SS) including &lt;em&gt;applied linguistics&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;sociology&lt;/em&gt; and two disciplines from natural sciences (NS) including &lt;em&gt;chemistry&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;medicine&lt;/em&gt;. The linguistic realizations of metadiscursive quantity strategies comprised of &lt;em&gt;endophoric markers&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;collapsers&lt;/em&gt; were estimated through a manual analysis of the corpus. The results showed that collapsing is a widespread strategy specifically among NS writers. Differences were found between SS and NS writers in their use of initials, citations and footnotes\endnotes. It is argued that collapsing is an inherent property of NS disciplines giving rise to the dense use of such markers. At the end, the implications of the study to teaching and learning writing research articles are discussed.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">research articles</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">metadiscourse</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">quantity markers</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">endophoric markers</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">collapsers</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_617_0bfaa6761ea17e8cb36af65a750102ac.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
