<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7995</Issn>
				<Volume>5</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An Investigation of Spoken Output and Intervention Types among Iranian EFL Learners</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>17</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>41</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17197</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sasan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Baleghizadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Shahid Beheshti University, İran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Arash</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saharkhiz</LastName>
<Affiliation>Shahid Beheshti University, İran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study was inspired by VanPatten and Uludag’s (2011) study on the transferability of training via processing instruction to output tasks and Mori’s (2002) work on the development of talk-in-interaction during a group task. An interview was devised as the pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest to compare four intervention types for teaching the simple past passive: traditional intervention as the comparison group and three task-based groups were processing instruction, consciousness-raising, and input enhancement. The interviews and the interactions during the treatments were also analyzed qualitatively. Task-based instruction (TBI) proved significantly more effective than traditional intervention and processing instruction significantly outperformed all others on both posttests. Furthermore, processing instruction was the only task-based intervention to retain its improvement till the delayed posttest. Qualitatively, processing instruction led to true negotiation of meaning and deep-level learning, consciousness-raising led to massive negotiation over the function of the target structure and deep-level learning, input enhancement led to enormous unfocused interaction about meaning, and traditional intervention just led to interaction about the forms. It was concluded that a well-planned processing instruction is a promising intervention for focusing on language form; however, due to the strong points cited for the other two tasks, their roles should not be ignored.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">input enhancement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">processing instruction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">consciousness-raising</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">traditional exercise-based intervention</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_17197_7fa3b199be348b4cfcae5ed158206691.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
