<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7995</Issn>
				<Volume>12</Volume>
				<Issue>25</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effects of Different Pedagogical Interventions on EFL Learners’ ‎Receptive and Productive Knowledge of Formulaic Sequences</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تاثیرات اقدامات آموزشی متفاوت بر دانش دریافتی و دانش مولد ترکیب های قالبی توسط فراگیران زبان ‏انگلیسی</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>95</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>130</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">10677</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/elt.2020.10677</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Masood</FirstName>
					<LastName>Esteki</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mansoor</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tavakoli</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of English Language, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amiryousefi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of TEFL, University of Isfahan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study sought to investigate the effects of Explicit ‎Instruction in combination with Input ‎Enhancement (EI+IE), Input Flood (IF), and Gap-fill (GF) tasks on receptive and productive ‎knowledge of English formulaic sequences (FS) ‎by Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Assigned ‎to three experimental groups‎, the 110 participants took the receptive and productive knowledge ‎pretests, posttests, and delayed posttests. Findings of within-group (repeated-‎measures ‎ANOVAs) and between-group (ANCOVAs) tests showed that while IF could not promote ‎learners&#039; performance, both the EI+IE and the GF could ‎improve learners’ receptive and ‎productive knowledge of target ‎FSs from pretests to posttests and ‎retained the effects until the ‎delayed posttests. Additionally, both EI+IE and GF groups ‎significantly outperformed the IF ‎group at the immediate posttests. That is, the results from EI+IE did not differ significantly from ‎those of GF. Plausible accounts for the obtained results are provided and the implications are ‎discussed.‎</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">input enhancement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Explicit ‎instruction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Input flood</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Gap-fill ‎tasks</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Formulaic sequences</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎Receptive knowledge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Productive knowledge ‎</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://elt.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_10677_fcdcf8f090ccf8ef0c36e6e79e059a1d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
